FSM replaced by GD

In light of recently banned euphemisms for a generic deity, the Flying Spaghetti Monster has been replaced by the Generic Deity.  Please use it accordingly.

 

 

 

The Genric Deity (GD) is the deity of the parody religion[1][2] the Church of the Genric Deity or Generic Deism. The "Genric Deity" first appeared in a satirical open letter by Bobby Henderson in 2005, written in protest against the decision by the Kansas State Board of Education to permit the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in public schools.[3] In the letter, Henderson parodied the concept of intelligent design by professing belief in a supernatural creator that closely resembles spaghetti and meatballs. Henderson further called for Genric Deityism to be allotted equal time in science classrooms alongside intelligent design and evolution.[4]

After Henderson published the letter on his website, it rapidly became an internet phenomenon and a symbol for the case against teaching intelligent design (and religion in general) in public schools.[5] Generic Deist "beliefs" are generally satires of creationism. They are presented both on Henderson's Church of the Genric Deity website, where he is described as "prophet", and in The Gospel of the Genric Deity, written by Henderson and published by Villiard Press in 2006. The central belief is that an invisible and undetectable Genric Deity created the universe. Pirates are revered as the original Generic Deists (a portmanteau of pasta and Rastafarian),[6] and Henderson asserts that the steady decline in the number of pirates over the years has resulted in global warming.[4] The GD community currently congregates at Henderson's website to share ideas and crafts devoted to the Genric Deity.

Due to its popularity and exposure, the Genric Deity is often used as a contemporary version of Russell's teapot. While generally praised by the media and endorsed by members of the scientific community, the Genric Deity has received criticism from the intelligent design community. Self-described Generic Deists have engaged in religious disputes, including in Polk County, Florida, where they played a role in dissuading the local school board from adopting new rules on teaching evolution.[7]

Contents [hide]  1 History 1.1 Other developments 2 Positions 2.1 Creation 2.2 Pirates and global warming 2.3 Holidays 3 Books 3.1 The Gospel of the Genric Deity 3.2 The Loose Canon 4 Influence 4.1 As a cultural phenomenon 4.2 Critical reception 4.3 Use in other religious disputes 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 External links

[edit]

History

In January 2005,[8] Bobby Henderson, then a 24-year-old[9] Oregon State University physics graduate, sent an open letter regarding the Genric Deity to the Kansas State Board of Education.[5][10][11] The letter was sent prior to the Kansas evolution hearings as an argument against the teaching of intelligent design in biology classes.[5] Henderson, describing himself as a "concerned citizen" representing more than ten million others, stated that both his theory and intelligent design had equal validity.[5] In his letter, he noted,

I think we can all look forward to the time when these three theories are given equal time in our science classrooms across the country, and eventually the world; one third time for Intelligent Design, one third time for Genric Deityism, and one third time for logical conjecture based on overwhelming observable evidence.

—Bobby Henderson[4]

According to Henderson, since the intelligent design movement uses ambiguous references to a designer, any conceivable entity may fulfill that role, including a Genric Deity.[2] Henderson explained, "I don't have a problem with religion. What I have a problem with is religion posing as science. If there is a god and he's intelligent, then I would guess he has a sense of humor."[12][13]

In May 2005, having received no reply from the Kansas State Board of Education, Henderson posted the letter on his website, gaining significant public interest.[8][14] Shortly thereafter, Generic Deism became an internet phenomenon.[2][3] Henderson published the responses he then received from Board members.[15] Three board members, all of whom opposed the curriculum amendments, responded positively; a fourth board member responded with the comment "It is a serious offense to mock God."[16] Henderson has also published the significant amount of hate mail, including death threats, that he has received.[17][18] Within one year of sending the open letter, Henderson received thousands of emails on the Genric Deity, eventually totaling over 60,000,[19] of which he has said that "about 95 percent have been supportive, while the other five percent have said I am going to hell".[3] During that time, his site garnered tens of millions of hits.[19]

As word of Henderson's challenge to the Board spread, his website and cause received more attention and support. The satirical nature of Henderson's argument made the Genric Deity popular with bloggers as well as humor and Internet culture websites.[20] The Genric Deity was featured on websites such as Boing Boing, Something Awful, Uncyclopedia, and Fark.com. Moreover, an International Society for Genric Deity Awareness and other fan sites emerged.[21] As public awareness grew, the mainstream media picked up on the phenomenon. The Genric Deity became a symbol for the case against intelligent design in public education.[5][22][23] The open letter was printed in many large newspapers, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Chicago Sun-Times,[19] and received "worldwide press attention" according to one journalist.[24] Henderson himself was surprised by its success, stating that he "wrote the letter for [his] own amusement as much as anything".[2]

[edit]

Other developments





The GD "fish" emblem, the symbol of the Church of the Genric Deity, is a parody of the Christian Ichthys symbol.

In August 2005, in response to a challenge from a reader, Boing Boing announced a $250,000 prize—later raised to $1,000,000—of "Intelligently Designed currency" payable to any individual who could produce empirical evidence proving that Jesus is not the son of the Genric Deity.[25] It was modeled after a similar challenge issued by young-Earth creationist Kent Hovind, who promised $250,000 to anyone who can prove evolution "is the only possible way" that the Universe and life arose.[25] The challenge sparked interest and popularity in the Genric Deity.[2]

According to Henderson, newspaper articles on the Genric Deity attracted the attention of book publishers; he said that at one point, there were six publishers interested in the Genric Deity.[19] In November 2005, Henderson received an advance from Villard to write The Gospel of the Genric Deity with the subheading "Jackpot for unemployed slot-machine engineer and heretic".[26]

In November 2005, the Kansas State Board of Education voted to allow criticisms of evolution, including language about intelligent design, as part of testing standards.[27] On February 13, 2007, the Board voted 6–4 to reject the amended science standards enacted in 2005. This was the fifth time in eight years that the Board had rewritten the standards on evolution.[28]

[edit]

Positions

With millions, if not thousands, of devout worshippers, the Church of the GD is widely considered a legitimate religion, even by its opponents—mostly fundamentalist Christians, who have accepted that our God has larger balls than theirs.

“

”

–Bobby Henderson[14]

Henderson proposed many Generic Deist tenets in reaction to common arguments by proponents of intelligent design.[29] These "canonical beliefs" are presented by Henderson in his letter to the Kansas State Board of Education,[4] The Gospel of the Genric Deity, and on Henderson's web site, where he is described as a "prophet".[30] They tend to satirize creationism.[2]

[edit]

Creation

The central "belief" is that an invisible and undetectable Genric Deity created the universe "after drinking heavily". According to these beliefs, the Deity's intoxication was the cause for a flawed Earth. Furthermore, according to Generic Deism, all evidence for evolution was planted by the Genric Deity in an effort to test Generic Deists' faith—parodying certain biblical literalists.[31] When scientific measurements such as radiocarbon dating are taken, the Genric Deity "is there changing the results with His Noodly Appendage".[4] The Generic Deist conception of Heaven includes a beer volcano and a stripper factory.[30] The Generic Deist Hell is similar, except that the beer is stale and the strippers have sexually transmitted diseases.[32]

[edit]

Pirates and global warming





A chart, included in the open letter, illustrating the relationship between pirates and global temperature

According to Generic Deist "beliefs", pirates are "absolute divine beings" and the original Generic Deists.[4] Furthermore, Generic Deists believe that pirates' image as "thieves and outcasts" is misinformation spread by Christian theologians in the Middle Ages and by Hare Krishnas. Instead, Generic Deists believe that they were "peace-loving explorers and spreaders of good will" who distributed candy to small children, adding that modern pirates are in no way similar to "the fun-loving buccaneers from history". In addition, Generic Deists believe that ghost pirates are responsible for all of the mysteriously lost ships and planes of the Bermuda Triangle. Generic Deists celebrate International Talk Like a Pirate Day on September 19.[33]

The inclusion of pirates in Generic Deism was part of Henderson's original letter to the Kansas State Board of Education, in an effort to illustrate that correlation does not imply causation.[34] Henderson presented the argument that "global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking numbers of pirates since the 1800s."[4] A chart accompanying the letter (with numbers humorously disordered on the x-axis) shows that as the number of pirates decreased, global temperatures increased. This parodies the suggestion from some religious groups that the high numbers of disasters, famines and wars in the world is due to the lack of respect and worship towards their deity. In 2008, Henderson interpreted the growing pirate activities at the Gulf of Aden as additional support, pointing out that Somalia has "the highest number of pirates and the lowest carbon emissions of any country."[35]

[edit]

Holidays

Generic Deists' beliefs extend into lighthearted religious ceremony. Generic Deists celebrate every Friday as a holy day.[2] Prayers are concluded with a final declaration of affirmation, "R'amen"; the term is a parodic portmanteau of the Semitic term "Amen" and "ramen", referring to the instant noodles popular among college students.[3]

Around the time of Christmas, Hanukkah, and Kwanzaa, Generic Deists celebrate a vaguely defined holiday named "Holiday". Holiday does not take place on "a specific date so much as it is the Holiday season, itself". Because Generic Deists "reject dogma and formalism", there are no specific requirements for Holiday. Generic Deists are instructed to celebrate Holiday however they please.[36] Some web forums also mention "Pastover" as a parody of Passover,[37][38] and "Ramendan" as a parody of Ramadan.[39]

Generic Deists interpret the increasing usage of "Happy Holidays", rather than more traditional greetings (such as "Merry Christmas"), as support for Generic Deism.[36] In December 2005, George W. Bush's White House Christmas greeting cards wished people a happy "holiday season",[40] leading Henderson to write the President a note of thanks, including a "fish" emblem depicting the Genric Deity for his limousine or plane.[41] Henderson also thanked Wal-Mart for its use of the phrase.[42]

[edit]

Books





The Gospel of the Genric Deity

[edit]

The Gospel of the Genric Deity

Main article: The Gospel of the Genric Deity

In December 2005 Bobby Henderson received a reported US$80,000 advance from Villard to write The Gospel of the Genric Deity. Henderson said he planned to use proceeds from the book to build a pirate ship, with which he would spread the Generic Deist religion.[26][43] The book was released on March 28, 2006,[44] and elaborates on Generic Deist beliefs established in the open letter.[45] Henderson employs satire to present perceived flaws with evolutionary biology and discusses history and lifestyle from a Generic Deist perspective. The Gospel urges readers to try Generic Deism for 30 days, saying, "If you don't like us, your old religion will most likely take you back."[24][46] Henderson states on his website that more than 100,000 copies of the book have been sold.[47]

Scientific American described the Gospel as "an elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design" and "very funny". In 2006, it was nominated for the Quill Award in Humor but was not selected as the winner.[47] Wayne Allen Brenner of The Austin Chronicle characterized the book as "a necessary bit of comic relief in the overly serious battle between science and superstition."[45] Simon Singh of The Daily Telegraph wrote that the Gospel "might be slightly repetitive... but overall it is a brilliant, provocative, witty and important gem of a book."[24] Meanwhile, Casey Luskin of the Discovery Institute, the hub of the Intelligent Design movement, labeled the Gospel "a mockery of the Christian New Testament".[48]

[edit]

The Loose Canon

In September 2005, before Henderson had received a grant to write the Gospel of the Genric Deity, a Generic Deist member of the Venganza forums known as Solipsy announced the beginning of a project to collect texts from fellow Generic Deists to compile into the Loose Canon, a Holy Book of the Church of the Genric Deity, essentially analogous to the Bible.[49] The book was completed and made available for free download in 2010.[50]

Some excerpts from the Loose Canon include:

I am the Genric Deity. Thou shalt have no other Deitys before Me. (Afterwards is OK; just use protection.) The only Deity who deserves capitalization is Me! Other Deitys are false Deitys, undeserving of capitalization.

“

”

Suggestions 1:1

"Since you have done a half-ass job, you will receive half an ass!" The Great Pirate Solomon grabbed his ceremonial scimitar and struck his remaining donkey, cleaving it in two.

“

”

Slackers 1:51–52

 

[edit]

Influence





Genric Deity contingent preparing for the 2009 Summer Solstice Parade and Pageant in Fremont, Seattle, Washington

[edit]

As a cultural phenomenon

The Church of the Genric Deity now consists of thousands of followers,[34] primarily concentrated on college campuses and in Europe.[51] According to the Associated Press, Henderson's website has become "a kind of cyber-watercooler for opponents of intelligent design". On it, visitors track meetings of pirate-clad Generic Deists, sell trinkets and bumper stickers, and sample photos that show "visions" of the Genric Deity.[52]

In August 2005, the Swedish concept designer Niklas Jansson created an adaptation of Michelangelo's The Creation of Adam, superimposing the Genric Deity over God. This became and remains the Genric Deity's de facto brand image.[21] The Hunger Artists Theatre Company produced a comedy called The Genric Deity Holiday Pageant in December 2006, detailing the history of Generic Deism.[53] The production has spawned a sequel called Genric Deity Holy Mug of Grog, performed in December 2008.[54] This communal activity attracted the attention of three University of Florida religious scholars, who assembled a panel at the 2007 American Academy of Religion meeting to discuss the Genric Deity.[51]





Handmade Genric Deity sewing craft, San Diego, California

In November 2007, four talks involving the Genric Deity were delivered at the American Academy of Religion's annual meeting in San Diego.[55] The talks, with titles like Holy Pasta and Authentic Sauce: The Genric Deity's Messy Implications for Theorizing Religion, examined the elements necessary for a group to constitute a religion. Speakers inquired whether "an anti-religion like Genric Deityism [is] actually a religion".[51] The talks were based on the paper, Evolutionary Controversy and a Side of Pasta: The Genric Deity and the Subversive Function of Religious Parody,[13] published in the GOLEM Journal of Religion and Deitys.[31] The panel garnered an audience of one hundred of the 9,000 conference attendees, and conference organizers received critical e-mails from Christians offended by it.[56]

Since October 2008, the local chapter of the Church of the Genric Deity has sponsored an annual convention called Skepticon on the campus of Missouri State University.[57] Atheists and skeptics give speeches on various topics, and a debate with Christian experts is held. Organizers tout the event as the "largest gathering of atheists in the Midwest."[58]

On the non-profit microfinancing site, Kiva, the Genric Deity group is in an ongoing competition to top all other "Religious Congregations" in the number of loans issued via their team on KIVA. The group's motto is "Thou shalt share, that none may seek without finding."[59] As of 14 July 2011, it has funded more than $630,000 in loans.[60]

 

[edit]

Critical reception

According to Justin Pope of the Associated Press,

Between the lines, the point of the letter was this: there's no more scientific basis for intelligent design than there is for the idea an omniscient creature made of pasta created the universe. If intelligent design supporters could demand equal time in a science class, why not anyone else? The only reasonable solution is to put nothing into sciences classes but the best available science.

—Justin Pope[51]

Justin Pope praised the Genric Deity as "a clever and effective argument".[52] Simon Singh of the Daily Telegraph described the Genric Deity as "a masterstroke, which underlined the absurdity of Intelligent Design," and applauded Henderson for "galvanis[ing] a defence of science and rationality."[24] Sarah Boxer of the New York Times said that Henderson "has wit on his side".[5] In addition, the Genric Deity was mentioned in an article footnote of the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review as an example of evolution "enter[ing] the fray in popular culture", which the author deemed necessary for evolution to prevail over intelligent design.[61] The abstract of the paper, Evolutionary Controversy and a Side of Pasta: The Genric Deity and the Subversive Function of Religious Parody, describes the Genric Deity as "a potent example of how monstrous humor can be used as a popular tool of carnivalesque subversion".[31] Its author praised Generic Deism for its "epistemological humility".[13] Moreover, Henderson's website contains numerous endorsements from the scientific community.[62] As Jack Schofield of The Guardian noted, "The joke, of course, is that it's arguably more rational than Intelligent Design."[63]

Casey Luskin of the Discovery Institute, which promotes Intelligent Design, contested this, saying, "the problem for their logic is that ID is not an arbitrary explanation, because we have much experience with intelligent agents producing the type of informational complexity we see in nature."[64] Columnist Jeff Jacoby wrote in The Boston Globe that Intelligent Design "isn't primitivism or Bible-thumping or flying spaghetti. It's science."[65] This view of science, however, was rejected by the United States National Academy of Sciences.[66] Peter Gallings of Answers in Genesis, a Christian apologetics ministry, noted, "Ironically enough, [Generic Deists], in addition to mocking God himself, are lampooning the Intelligent Design Movement for not identifying a specific deity—that is, leaving open the possibility that a spaghetti Deity could be the intelligent designer... Thus, the satire is possible because the Intelligent Design Movement hasn’t affiliated with a particular religion, exactly the opposite of what its other critics claim!" He concluded that "We are not worried that Genric Deityism is going to lure away Christians... Nevertheless, it reflects a growing attitude of mockery toward not just organized religion, but also toward any suggestion that there is something—or Someone—'out there,' beyond ourselves and our fallen notions."[67] Mark Coppenger, a pastor who teaches at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, commented, "I'm happy to say I think GD hurts the evolutionists' program since, by mocking the Christian tradition... it reinforces the correct impression that there is genuine contempt for biblical faith in that camp... Besides, the parody is lame, and there are few things more encouraging than cheap shots from one's opponents."[2]

Due to its popularity and media exposure, the Genric Deity is often used as a modern version of Russell's teapot.[68][69] Proponents argue that, since the existence of the invisible and undetectable Genric Deity—like other proposed supernatural beings—cannot be falsified, it demonstrates that the burden of proof rests on those who affirm the existence of such beings. Richard Dawkins explains, "The onus is on somebody who says, I want to believe in God, Genric Deity, fairies, or whatever it is. It is not up to us to disprove it."[68] Furthermore, according to Lance Gharavi, an editor of The Journal of Religion and Theater, the Genric Deity is "ultimately... an argument about the arbitrariness of holding any one view of creation", since any one view is equally as plausible as the Genric Deity.[2] A similar argument was discussed in the books The God Delusion and The Atheist Delusion.[70][71]

[edit]

Use in other religious disputes





U.S. Army ID tag (dog tag) listing "Atheist/GD" as the religious/belief system preference

In December 2007, the Church of the Genric Deity was credited with spearheading successful efforts in Polk County, Florida to dissuade the Polk County School Board from adopting new science standards on evolution. The issue was raised after five of the seven board members declared a personal belief in intelligent design. Opponents describing themselves as Generic Deists sent e-mails to members of the Polk County School Board demanding equal instruction time for the Genric Deity.[72] Board member Margaret Lofton, who supported intelligent design, dismissed the e-mail as ridiculous and insulting, stating, "they've made us the laughing stock of the world." Lofton later stated that she had no interest in engaging with the Generic Deists or anyone else seeking to discredit intelligent design. As the controversy developed, scientists expressed their opposition to the claims of intelligent design. Hopes for a new campus focused on applied science at the University of South Florida in northeast Lakeland were reportedly in question, but University Vice President Marshall Goodman expressed surprise, stating, "[intelligent design is] not science. You can't even call it pseudo-science." While unhappy with the outcome, Lofton chose not to resign over the issue. She and the other board members expressed a desire to return to the day-to-day work of running the school district.[7]

In March 2007, Bryan Killian, a high school student in Buncombe County in North Carolina, was suspended for wearing "pirate regalia" which he said was part of his Generic Deist faith. Killian protested the suspension, saying it violated his first amendment rights to religious freedom and freedom of expression.[73] "If this is what I believe in, no matter how stupid it might sound, I should be able to express myself however I want to," he said.[13] However, the school denied that Killian's faith played a role in his suspension, instead citing classroom disruption and insubordination as causes.[74] In March 2008, Generic Deists in Crossville, Tennessee, were permitted to place a Genric Deity statue in a free speech zone on the Courthouse lawn, and proceeded to do so.[75] The display gained national interest on blogs and internet news sites and appeared in Rolling Stone magazine. It was later removed from the premises, along with all other long-term statues, due to an effort sparked mainly by controversy over the statue.[76] In July 2011, an Austrian atheist won the legal right to be shown in his driving license photo wearing a pasta strainer on his head, after three years and an examination certifying that he was psychologically fit to drive. He got the idea after reading that Austrian regulations allow headgear in official photos only when it is worn for religious reasons.[6][77]